IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v22y2017i02p442-467_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Results of survey on hedging practices

Author

Listed:
  • Cadman, J. M.
  • Bhatia, R.
  • Dissanayake, N. A.
  • Mageed, S.
  • Rogers, I. J.
  • Zavadlal, G.

Abstract

The hedging practices survey took place towards the end of 2015 in the final few months prior to Solvency II regulations coming into force. At the point of completing the survey we would expect that companies would have largely transitioned their hedging approaches to work in a Solvency II environment. There may be some cases where further changes were planned but not implemented at the point of completing the survey. Further, as familiarity with working under the new regulations increases, approaches are expected to continue to develop over time. The working party hopes that this report is useful in summarising industry attitudes at this point in time and as a comparator in future years. Before launching the survey we did have several conjectures of what we may expect to see in the results. Some proved true, for some it was difficult to glean any strong conclusion from the data, and there were one or two where results countered what we expected to see.

Suggested Citation

  • Cadman, J. M. & Bhatia, R. & Dissanayake, N. A. & Mageed, S. & Rogers, I. J. & Zavadlal, G., 2017. "Results of survey on hedging practices," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 442-467, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:22:y:2017:i:02:p:442-467_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321717000083/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:22:y:2017:i:02:p:442-467_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.