IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v20y2015i03p491-511_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ROC Working Party: Towards the Optimal Reserving Process. The Fast Close process

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce, Neil
  • Lauder, Alastair
  • Heath, Cameron
  • Bennett, Camilla
  • Wong, Chi
  • Overton, Gregory
  • Ryan, Joe
  • Laidlar, Katherine
  • Taylor, Keith
  • Jenkins, Tim

Abstract

Our principal focus in this paper is on ways that a Fast Close process (or indeed any reserving process) can be structured to maximise the value added within the process given the time and resource available. This builds on the use of actual vs. expected techniques investigated in our previous paper, and also looks at forces external to the reserving function that may derail smooth progress. We highlight a number of practical ways that the balance can be restored in favour of adding value rather than crunching numbers. This paper forms the second in the TORP series.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce, Neil & Lauder, Alastair & Heath, Cameron & Bennett, Camilla & Wong, Chi & Overton, Gregory & Ryan, Joe & Laidlar, Katherine & Taylor, Keith & Jenkins, Tim, 2015. "ROC Working Party: Towards the Optimal Reserving Process. The Fast Close process," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 491-511, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:20:y:2015:i:03:p:491-511_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321715000021/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:20:y:2015:i:03:p:491-511_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.