IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v13y2007i3p557-577_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solvency II. A Panel Discussion

Author

Listed:
  • Anonymous

Abstract

The European Commission's project to develop a Europe-wide risk-based solvency supervision framework is well advanced, with the draft Directive due to be put before the European Parliament in June 2007. The consultation exercise which has helped to shape the proposals has been wide ranging, and will continue for some time to come. Actuarial input into the proposals has been extensive. As well as the activity of individual actuaries, the Groupe Consultatif has a large team of volunteers spread across a number of working parties, and the United Kingdom Actuarial Profession has two U.K. working parties set up, respectively, by the General Insurance and the Life Boards. While many aspects of the proposed framework have been well debated across Europe and the overall shape of the likely final outcome is reasonably well understood, a number of significant issues still remain. It is important that actuaries are aware of what might be in store, and what could be done now to help to prepare for the new regime. On the eve of the start of the third round of Europe-wide test calculations (Quantitative Impact Study 3, or QIS3 for short), therefore, it is appropriate to hold a Panel Discussion to explore some of the key issues and possible implications. A Briefing Note follows this introduction. The meeting takes the form of presentations by the three panel members, and the discussion follows.

Suggested Citation

  • Anonymous, 2007. "Solvency II. A Panel Discussion," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 557-577, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:13:y:2007:i:3:p:557-577_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1357321700001550/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:13:y:2007:i:3:p:557-577_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.