IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bracjl/v13y2007i02p185-236_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credit Derivatives. Prepared by the Derivatives Working Party of the Faculty and Institute of Actuaries

Author

Listed:
  • Muir, M. J.
  • Chase, A.
  • Coleman, P. S.
  • Cooper, P.
  • Finkelstein, G. S.
  • Fulcher, P.
  • Harvey, C.
  • Pereira, F. R.
  • Shamash, A.
  • Wilkins, T. J. D.

Abstract

This paper was written by the Derivatives Working Party, a permanent working party of the Life Research Committee of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries. Our aim is to consider how life assurers may use, or may wish to use, derivatives, and if their use is unduly constrained, e.g. by regulation. This paper focuses on credit derivatives. We provide an overview of the credit derivatives market, and the strong growth in this market over recent years. We then focus on the two main traded credit derivative instruments — Credit Default Swaps (CDSs) and Collateralised Debt Obligations (CDOs). We explain how these instruments work and are priced, and clarify some of the more complex topics involved, such as the settlement of CDSs, basis risk and the relevance of implied correlation in pricing CDOs. We then consider how life insurers could make use of credit derivatives, for example to provide more efficient investment management in taking exposure to credit risk, or to hedge credit exposures, and consider the regulatory implications of so doing. Finally, in the Appendix, we discuss the credit spread puzzle, and the existence or otherwise of a liquidity premium in corporate bond spreads, with implications for the valuation of illiquid liabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Muir, M. J. & Chase, A. & Coleman, P. S. & Cooper, P. & Finkelstein, G. S. & Fulcher, P. & Harvey, C. & Pereira, F. R. & Shamash, A. & Wilkins, T. J. D., 2007. "Credit Derivatives. Prepared by the Derivatives Working Party of the Faculty and Institute of Actuaries," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 185-236, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:13:y:2007:i:02:p:185-236_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S135732170000146X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bracjl:v:13:y:2007:i:02:p:185-236_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/baj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.