IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bpubpo/v9y2025i4p803-825_9.html

Improving compliance with COVID-19 guidance: a workplace field experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Arroyos-Calvera, Danae
  • Drouvelis, Michalis
  • Lohse, Johannes
  • McDonald, Rebecca

Abstract

Compliance with hygiene and other safety measures in the workplace was an important component of society's strategy for reducing infections at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular before vaccinations were widely available. We report the results of a field trial of well-established behavioural interventions (social norms, pledging and messenger effects) we implemented to improve compliance with such measures in an occupational setting. We use daily reports of own and other's behaviour to assess the effects of these interventions and supplement these subjective (self-reported) measures with objective data on hand sanitiser usage. The behavioural interventions tested have statistically significant but quantitatively moderate effects on subjective compliance measures and minimal effects on hand sanitiser usage. All effects of our interventions are short-term in nature and dissipate shortly after implementation. Our findings thus provide at most weak support for the notion that typical behavioural interventions can help support compliance with infection prevention measures in the workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Arroyos-Calvera, Danae & Drouvelis, Michalis & Lohse, Johannes & McDonald, Rebecca, 2025. "Improving compliance with COVID-19 guidance: a workplace field experiment," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(4), pages 803-825, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bpubpo:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:803-825_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2398063X23000313/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bpubpo:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:803-825_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.