A Markov ageing-based multi-state group self-annuitisation

This paper extends the traditional group self-annuitisation framework by explicitly incorporating mortality heterogeneity among participants. Heterogeneity stems from multiple factors that lead individuals to age at different paces, despite being born in the same year. Ageing is modelled as a finite-state continuous-time Markov process where each state represents a distinct phase of physiological deterioration, and transitions capture the stochastic progression towards death. Benefits are differentiated by ageing state and, after issue, they are dynamically adjusted in response to the realised evolution of both ageing and mortality. Our design is novel in its use of the Markov ageing framework within a risk-sharing scheme and in how benefits are updated. Indeed, both benefits and their respective adjustment coefficients are state-specific. Through the explicit modelling of cross-subsidies across states, the design ensures that actuarial equivalence between benefits and available resources is preserved both at the pool level and within each ageing state. However, we find that benefit adjustments based on actuarial equivalence may display undesirable patterns in some ageing classes, when their size shrinks substantially; this happens, in particular, in the younger ageing states, which are likely to empty out. To contrast such effects, we introduce a design preserving a target level of differentiation across states that mitigates the unfavourable impact of a declining size for younger ages. In our analysis, we point out that such a design (which is desirable in many respects) implies solidarity effects across states. Such effects can be identified by comparing benefit amounts under the two assumptions (i.e., benefits adjusted according to actuarial equivalence or so to preserve a predefined level of differentiation). The proposed framework is tested using Australian mortality data.