IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v56y2026i3p_10.html

A two-account pricing framework for hybrid variable annuity contract embedded with living and death benefit riders

Author

Listed:
  • Alonso-García, Jennifer
  • Thirurajah, Samuel
  • Ziveyi, Jonathan

Abstract

This study investigates a hybrid variable annuity (VA) contract that combines guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit (GMAB) and guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB) riders, with the added flexibility for policyholders to surrender prior to maturity. The contract guarantees the return of premiums or a greater rolled-up value at either maturity or death. We propose a novel two-account structure: an investment account tied to the underlying fund, from which management fees are deducted, and a separate cash account for the deduction of insurance fees for funding the GMAB and GMDB riders. This design generalizes the conventional single-account model by decoupling fee sources. From the policyholder’s perspective, we derive actuarially fair insurance charges and show that the two-account framework delivers substantially lower guarantee fees compared to the classical design, improves contract characteristics by reducing the effective moneyness of embedded guarantees, thereby discouraging early surrenders and mitigating mortality risk mispricing. Furthermore, we show that bundling survival and death benefits results in higher fair fees than the sum of standalone riders, thereby enhancing the product’s appeal to insurers. The analysis also incorporates taxation considerations up to a predefined preservation age, reflecting regulatory and practical product design constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Alonso-García, Jennifer & Thirurajah, Samuel & Ziveyi, Jonathan, 2026. "A two-account pricing framework for hybrid variable annuity contract embedded with living and death benefit riders," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(3), pages -10, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:56:y:2026:i:3:p:_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0515036126100981/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:56:y:2026:i:3:p:_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.