IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v56y2026i1p89-100_4.html

Stationary probabilities and the monotone likelihood ratio in bonus-malus systems

Author

Listed:
  • Ágoston, Kolos Csaba
  • Papp, Dávid

Abstract

The bonus-malus system (BMS) is a widely recognized and commonly employed risk management tool. A well-designed BMS can match expected insurance payments with estimated claims even in a diverse group of risks. Although there has been abundant research on improving bonus-malus (BM) systems, one important aspect has been overlooked: the stationary probability of a BMS satisfies the monotone likelihood ratio property. The monotone likelihood ratio for stationary probabilities allows us to better understand how riskier policyholders are more likely to remain in higher premium categories, while less risky policyholders are more likely to move toward lower premiums. This study establishes this property for BMSs that are described by an ergodic Markov chain with one possible claim and a transition rule +1/-d. We derive this result from the linear recurrences that characterize the stationary distribution; this represents a novel analytical approach in this domain. We also illustrate the practical implications of our findings: in the BM design problem, the premium scale is automatically monotonic.

Suggested Citation

  • Ágoston, Kolos Csaba & Papp, Dávid, 2026. "Stationary probabilities and the monotone likelihood ratio in bonus-malus systems," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(1), pages 89-100, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:56:y:2026:i:1:p:89-100_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0515036125100597/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:56:y:2026:i:1:p:89-100_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.