IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v55y2025i3p644-667_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fairness and risk sharing in integrated LRD-tontine schemes under Volterra mortality risk

Author

Listed:
  • Kang, Jingwen
  • Jin, Zhuo
  • Qian, Linyi
  • Zhang, Nan

Abstract

As the global elderly population expands, the associated risks of longevity intensify, presenting significant challenges to traditional retirement security systems. We study actuarial fairness in tontines under the Volterra mortality framework, integrating long-range dependence mortality models rates with tontine structures. Initially, we establish an optimal tontine model for a homogeneous tontine under this framework. However, according only to individual actuarial fairness can neglect the collective nature of tontines. So we propose a hybrid optimization model that accounts for age and wealth discrepancies affecting payment amounts and the collective fairness. Specially, we first apply the f-value fairness measure in age-heterogeneous tontines for assessing fairness. Our results reveal that while the model ensures actuarial fairness at the group level, relative payments are lower for older age groups. By incorporating dynamic mortality modeling through the Volterra mortality framework, our work demonstrates that this comprehensive scheme significantly enhances the robustness and sustainability of retirement security systems. These findings provide valuable insights for the future integration of dynamic mortality models with innovative retirement income structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Kang, Jingwen & Jin, Zhuo & Qian, Linyi & Zhang, Nan, 2025. "Fairness and risk sharing in integrated LRD-tontine schemes under Volterra mortality risk," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(3), pages 644-667, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:55:y:2025:i:3:p:644-667_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0515036125100573/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:55:y:2025:i:3:p:644-667_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.