IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v54y2024i1p25-45_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction of rating systems using global sensitivity analysis: A numerical investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Vallarino, Arianna
  • Rabitti, Giovanni
  • Khorrami Chokami, Amir

Abstract

The ratemaking process is a key issue in insurance pricing. It consists in pooling together policyholders with similar risk profiles into rating classes and assigning the same premium for policyholders in the same class. In actuarial practice, rating systems are typically not based on all risk factors but rather only some of factors are selected to construct the rating classes. The objective of this study is to investigate the selection of risk factors in order to construct rating classes that exhibit maximum internal homogeneity. For this selection, we adopt the Shapley effects from global sensitivity analysis. While these sensitivity indices are used for model interpretability, we apply them to construct rating classes. We provide a new strategy to estimate them, and we connect them to the intra-class variability and heterogeneity of the rating classes. To verify the appropriateness of our procedure, we introduce a measure of heterogeneity specifically designed to compare rating systems with a different number of classes. Using a well-known car insurance dataset, we show that the rating system constructed with the Shapley effects is the one minimizing this heterogeneity measure.

Suggested Citation

  • Vallarino, Arianna & Rabitti, Giovanni & Khorrami Chokami, Amir, 2024. "Construction of rating systems using global sensitivity analysis: A numerical investigation," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(1), pages 25-45, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:54:y:2024:i:1:p:25-45_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S051503612300034X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:54:y:2024:i:1:p:25-45_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.