IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v53y2023i3p515-544_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intergenerational risk sharing in a defined contribution pension system: analysis with Bayesian optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, An
  • Kanagawa, Motonobu
  • Zhang, Fangyuan

Abstract

We study a fully funded, collective defined contribution (DC) pension system with multiple overlapping generations. We investigate whether the welfare of participants can be improved by intergenerational risk sharing (IRS) implemented with a realistic investment strategy (e.g., no borrowing) and without an outside entity (e.g., shareholders) that helps finance the pension fund. To implement IRS, the pension system uses an automatic adjustment rule for the indexation of individual accounts, which adapts to the notional funding ratio of the pension system. The pension system has two parameters that determine the investment strategy and the strength of the adjustment rule, which are optimized by expected utility maximization using Bayesian optimization. The volatility of the retirement benefits and that of the funding ratio are analyzed, and it is shown that the trade-off between them can be controlled by the optimal adjustment parameter to attain IRS. Compared with the optimal individual DC benchmark using the life cycle strategy, the studied pension system with IRS is shown to improve the welfare of risk-averse participants, when the financial market is volatile.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, An & Kanagawa, Motonobu & Zhang, Fangyuan, 2023. "Intergenerational risk sharing in a defined contribution pension system: analysis with Bayesian optimization," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(3), pages 515-544, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:53:y:2023:i:3:p:515-544_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0515036123000181/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:53:y:2023:i:3:p:515-544_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.