IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v46y2016i01p165-190_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Longevity Risk With Generalized Dynamic Factor Models And Vine-Copulae

Author

Listed:
  • Chuliá, Helena
  • Guillén, Montserrat
  • Uribe, Jorge M.

Abstract

We present a methodology to forecast mortality rates and estimate longevity and mortality risks. The methodology uses generalized dynamic factor models fitted to the differences in the log-mortality rates. We compare their prediction performance with that of models previously described in the literature, including the traditional static factor model fitted to log-mortality rates. We also construct risk measures using vine-copula simulations, which take into account the dependence between the idiosyncratic components of the mortality rates. The methodology is applied to forecast mortality rates for a population portfolio for the UK and to estimate longevity and mortality risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuliá, Helena & Guillén, Montserrat & Uribe, Jorge M., 2016. "Modeling Longevity Risk With Generalized Dynamic Factor Models And Vine-Copulae," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 165-190, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:46:y:2016:i:01:p:165-190_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0515036115000215/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Rui & Ji, Min, 2021. "Modelling mortality dependence: An application of dynamic vine copula," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 241-255.
    2. Jorge M. Uribe & Helena Chuliá & Montserrat Guillen, 2018. "Trends in the Quantiles of the Life Table Survivorship Function," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 34(5), pages 793-817, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:46:y:2016:i:01:p:165-190_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.