IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v41y2011i02p343-376_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Genetic Information on the Insurance Industry: Conclusions from the ‘Bottom-Up’ Modelling Programme

Author

Listed:
  • Macdonald, Angus
  • Yu, Fei

Abstract

We quantify the overall impact of genetic information on the insurance industry using the ‘bottom-up’ approach, in which detailed models are constructed of representative major genetic disorders. We consider six such disorders, namely adult polycystic kidney disease, early-onset Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease, myotonic dystrophy (MD), hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer; and breast/ovarian cancer. Actuarial models based on the epidemiological literature exist for all these except MD. We parameterise a suitable model of MD, then synthesize the results from all six models to estimate the adverse selection costs arising from restrictions on insurers' use of genetic information. These are all very small, only in the most extreme cases rising above 1% of premiums. In the worst case — females displaying ‘extreme’ adverse selection in a ‘small’ critical illness insurance market, with the use of family history banned — the cost is about 3% of premiums. Our model includes the most common single-gene disorders relevant to insurance, and includes representatives of most important classes of these disorders. While the ‘bottom-up’ approach could be continued by modelling more and more diseases, we suggest that our model is adequate to draw robust conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Macdonald, Angus & Yu, Fei, 2011. "The Impact of Genetic Information on the Insurance Industry: Conclusions from the ‘Bottom-Up’ Modelling Programme," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(2), pages 343-376, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:41:y:2011:i:02:p:343-376_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0515036100000866/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anya E. R. Prince & Wendy R. Uhlmann & Sonia M. Suter & Aaron M. Scherer, 2021. "Genetic testing and insurance implications: Surveying the US general population about discrimination concerns and knowledge of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA)," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 24(4), pages 341-365, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:41:y:2011:i:02:p:343-376_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.