IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v27y1997i01p83-98_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credibility in the Regression case Revisited (A Late Tribute to Charles A. Hachemeister)

Author

Listed:
  • Bühlmann, H.
  • Gisler, A.

Abstract

Many authors have observed that Hachemeisters Regression Model for Credibility – if applied to simple linear regression – leads to unsatisfactory credibility matrices: they typically ‘mix up’ the regression parameters and in particular lead to regression lines that seem ‘out of range’ compared with both individual and collective regression lines. We propose to amend these shortcomings by an appropriate definition of the regression parameters: –intercept –slope Contrary to standard practice the intercept should however not be defined as the value at time zero but as the value of the regression line at the barycenter of time. With these definitions regression parameters which are uncorrected in the collective can be estimated separately by standard one dimensional credibility techniques. A similar convenient reparametrization can also be achieved in the general regression case. The good choice for the regression parameters is such as to turn the design matrix into an array with orthogonal columns.

Suggested Citation

  • Bühlmann, H. & Gisler, A., 1997. "Credibility in the Regression case Revisited (A Late Tribute to Charles A. Hachemeister)," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 83-98, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:27:y:1997:i:01:p:83-98_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0515036100011909/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pitselis, Georgios, 2008. "Robust regression credibility: The influence function approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 288-300, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:27:y:1997:i:01:p:83-98_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.