IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v99y2005i01p75-92_05.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Racial Orders in American Political Development

Author

Listed:
  • KING, DESMOND S.
  • SMITH, ROGERS M.

Abstract

American political science has long struggled to deal adequately with issues of race. Many studies inaccurately treat their topics as unrelated to race. Many studies of racial issues lack clear theoretical accounts of the relationships of race and politics. Drawing on arguments in the American political development literature, this essay argues for analyzing race, and American politics more broadly, in terms of two evolving, competing “racial institutional orders†: a “white supremacist†order and an “egalitarian transformative†order. This conceptual framework can synthesize and unify many arguments about race and politics that political scientists have advanced, and it can also serve to highlight the role of race in political developments that leading scholars have analyzed without attention to race. The argument here suggests that no analysis of American politics is likely to be adequate unless the impact of these racial orders is explicitly considered or their disregard explained.

Suggested Citation

  • King, Desmond S. & Smith, Rogers M., 2005. "Racial Orders in American Political Development," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 99(1), pages 75-92, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:99:y:2005:i:01:p:75-92_05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055405051506/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Megan Ming Francis, 2022. "Can Black Lives Matter within U.S. Democracy?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 699(1), pages 186-199, January.
    2. Zheng Yan & Wenqian Robertson & Yaosheng Lou & Tom W. Robertson & Sung Yong Park, 2021. "Finding leading scholars in mobile phone behavior: a mixed-method analysis of an emerging interdisciplinary field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(12), pages 9499-9517, December.
    3. Walker Wright, 2022. "Illiberal economic institutions and racial intolerance in the United States," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 307-326, June.
    4. Jamila Michener, 2022. "Race, power, and policy: understanding state anti-eviction policies during COVID-19 [Pandemic politics: Timing state-level social distancing responses to COVID-19]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(2), pages 231-246.
    5. Adrienne LeBas & Ngonidzashe Munemo, 2019. "Elite Conflict, Compromise, and Enduring Authoritarianism: Polarization in Zimbabwe, 1980–2008," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 681(1), pages 209-226, January.
    6. H. Howell Williams, 2021. "Just Mothering: Amy Coney Barrett and the Racial Politics of American Motherhood," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Yonn Dierwechter, 2020. "New Urbanism as Urban Political Development: Racial Geographies of ‘Intercurrence’ across Greater Seattle," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 417-428.
    8. Regina Baker, 2021. "The Historical Racial Regime and Racial Inequality in Poverty in the American South," LIS Working papers 820, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    9. Jae Yeon Kim, 2021. "Integrating human and machine coding to measure political issues in ethnic newspaper articles," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 585-612, November.
    10. Daniel J. Galvin, 2020. "Let’s not conflate APD with political history, and other reflections on “Causal Inference and American Political Development”," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 485-500, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:99:y:2005:i:01:p:75-92_05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.