IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v86y1992i04p966-976_09.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theory and Practice: Alfarabi's Plato Revisited

Author

Listed:
  • Colmo, Christopher

Abstract

According to Leo Strauss, knowledge of the best way of life is crucial to political philosophy. In “Farabi's Plato,†Strauss asks, assuming that the theoretical life can be known to be the best way of life, what is the status of this knowledge? Is the knowledge of the best way of life itself theoretical knowledge or practical knowledge? Without a coherent answer to this question, we cannot be certain that we know what we mean when we claim to know that philosophy is the best way of life. Strauss answers clearly the question about the status of the knowledge of the best way of life by affirming that it is practical, not theoretical, knowledge. For a variety of reasons, this answer is not persuasive in the form in which Strauss gives it.

Suggested Citation

  • Colmo, Christopher, 1992. "Theory and Practice: Alfarabi's Plato Revisited," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 86(4), pages 966-976, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:86:y:1992:i:04:p:966-976_09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000305540009122X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:86:y:1992:i:04:p:966-976_09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.