IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v78y1984i01p31-43_25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Free Association and the Theory of Proportional Representation

Author

Listed:
  • Sugden, Robert

Abstract

Several of the earliest advocates of proportional representation upheld the “principle of free association†: that electors should be free to choose the constituencies to which they belong. This article analyzes this principle in game-theoretic terms and investigates how far the free association “game†can be simulated through proportional representation. It is assumed that each voter's prime concern is that his most-preferred candidate should be elected. If preferences are single peaked, the outcome of an election based on free association can be predicted; the same outcome would result from a modified form of the single transferable vote.

Suggested Citation

  • Sugden, Robert, 1984. "Free Association and the Theory of Proportional Representation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 78(1), pages 31-43, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:78:y:1984:i:01:p:31-43_25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400252416/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edith Elkind & Piotr Faliszewski & Piotr Skowron & Arkadii Slinko, 2017. "Properties of multiwinner voting rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(3), pages 599-632, March.
    2. Uzi Segal & Avia Spivak, 1986. "Why so much stability? On the single membership constituency and the law of large numbers: A note," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 183-190, January.
    3. Tanner, Thomas Cole, 1994. "The spatial theory of elections: an analysis of voters' predictive dimensions and recovery of the underlying issue space," ISU General Staff Papers 1994010108000018174, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Benoit, J.P. & Kornhauser, L.A., 1996. "On Candidate-Based Analyses of Assembly Elections," Working Papers 96-29, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:78:y:1984:i:01:p:31-43_25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.