IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v70y1976i02p456-468_17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clashing Beliefs Within the Executive Branch: The Nixon Administration Bureaucracy

Author

Listed:
  • Aberbach, Joel D.
  • Rockman, Bert A.

Abstract

This article examines two key political beliefs of high level American federal executives: their views on the role of government in providing social services and their views regarding inequities in political representation. Data were collected in 1970 through open-ended interviews with a sample of 126 political appointees and supergrade career civil servants in the domestic agencies. Both of the beliefs analyzed were pertinent to the efforts of the Nixon administration to reorder national priorities and policies. The evidence in the paper establishes differences in the outlooks of administrators depending on agency, job status, and party affiliation. Agency and party affiliation are particularly important variables, and their joint effects on the beliefs examined are substantial. Democratic administrators in the social service agenoies were the most liberal and Republicans in the non-social service agencies the most conservative. Our data document a career bureaucracy with very little Republican representation and a social service bureaucracy dominated by administrators ideologically hostile to many of the directions pursued by the Nixon administration in the realm of social policy. The article closes with a discussion of the implications of our findings for future conflicts between the elected executive and the bureaucracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Aberbach, Joel D. & Rockman, Bert A., 1976. "Clashing Beliefs Within the Executive Branch: The Nixon Administration Bureaucracy," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 70(2), pages 456-468, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:70:y:1976:i:02:p:456-468_17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400173344/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sangyub Ryu & Yongjin Chang, 2017. "Accountability, Political Views, and Bureaucratic Behavior: A Theoretical Approach," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 481-494, December.
    2. Sangyub Ryu & Yongjin Chang, 2016. "Accountability, Political Views, and Bureaucratic Behavior: A Theoretical Approach," Working Papers EMS_2016_05, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    3. Timothy P. Nokken & Brian R. Sala, 2000. "Confirmation Dynamics: A Model of Presidential Appointments to Independent Agencies," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 12(1), pages 91-112, January.
    4. Bert A. Rockman, 2001. "Politics by Other Means: Administrative Reform in the United States," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Shaheen Naseer, 2019. "Public Spending, Quality of Bureaucracy and Economic Growth: A Theoretical Analysis," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 203-221.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:70:y:1976:i:02:p:456-468_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.