IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v66y1972i02p525-528_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Modern Bureaucracies Dominate Underdeveloped Polities? A Test of the Imbalance Thesis

Author

Listed:
  • Sigelman, Lee

Abstract

This research note analyzes a key premise of the thesis of “institutional imbalance†in less developed nations, the idea that administrative modernity promotes overparticipation in the performance of political and governmental functions. Judgmental data on fifty-seven Latin American, Asian, and African nations suggest that level of administrative development is highly correlated with overparticipation, but in precisely the opposite direction from that predicted in the literature— that is, the relationship is negative. This finding indicates the necessity of reconsidering some of the conventional wisdom of comparative administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Sigelman, Lee, 1972. "Do Modern Bureaucracies Dominate Underdeveloped Polities? A Test of the Imbalance Thesis," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 66(2), pages 525-528, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:66:y:1972:i:02:p:525-528_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400139954/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:66:y:1972:i:02:p:525-528_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.