Ideology and Pragmatism: Philosophy or Passion?

In “Politics, Ideology, And Belief Systems†Professor Sartori has undertaken the Sisyphean task of drawing up conceptual schemes to distinguish the political mentalities of the pragmatist and the ideologist. His “Hypothesis†poses the curious proposition that “ideology and pragmatisms qua ‘political cultures’ are related, respectively, to the ‘cultural matrixes’ rationalism and empiricism.†(p. 402) When political scientists put forth hypotheses, students of history are usually not far behind with their arid facts and pale negations. Sartori's hypothesis is an intriguing theoretical formulation of a central issue in twentieth century politics; whether it is historically valid is the concern of this article. For the question that remains uppermost as I read his article is simply who are the ideologists and who are the pragmatists? Historically considered, if we were to apply Sartori's defining characteristics to a specific context it may very well be that the totalitarian “ideologies†of communism and fascism would have to be judged “pragmatic,†while the mentality of American political behavior may even have to be considered “ideological.†Since I am sure Professor Sartori did not have this ironic interpretation in mind, perhaps some elaboration is in order. When Marx turned Hegel on his head he not only gave a materialistic base to German idealism but imputed an activistic impulse to political theory. Dialectical materialism is the “actualization of philosophy,†the extension of contemplative thought into real life. And whether regarded as a “knowing-process†or as Sartori's “belief system,†Marxism represented a rejection of both the deductive rationalism of Descartes and the sensationalist rationalism of Locke.