IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v61y1967i04p1078-1087_22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Universal Suffrage: A Comparison of Popular and Property Voting

Author

Listed:
  • Vines, Kenneth N.
  • Glick, Henry Robert

Abstract

The attainment of universal suffrage over various forms of voting restrictions has been one of the major accomplishments in the development of modern democratic institutions. Struggles for the vote have had to overcome restrictions based on factors such as sex, race and tenure of property. While gaps in the exercise of the franchise still remain, formal restrictions on voting in the United States have been largely removed.However, an important question, largely uninvestigated, concerns the “costs†of the universal franchise in terms of the quality of government and its impact upon policy decisions. Do the disadvantages of universal suffrage offset advantages said to be gained, particularly in Western nations, such as increased legitimization of decisions and stability of regimes? Many of the past and present opponents of the extension of voting have argued that the poor results to be expected from the impact of universal suffrage far outweigh the advantages. Clearly, the problem of “costs†is important, for it is a crucial element in the argument over democracy and the vote.

Suggested Citation

  • Vines, Kenneth N. & Glick, Henry Robert, 1967. "The Impact of Universal Suffrage: A Comparison of Popular and Property Voting," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 61(4), pages 1078-1087, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:61:y:1967:i:04:p:1078-1087_22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400224039/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudio López-Guerra, 2011. "The enfranchisement lottery," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 10(2), pages 211-233, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:61:y:1967:i:04:p:1078-1087_22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.