Scientists and the Policy Process

Alan T. Waterman (retired Director of the National Science Foundation and past president of the A.A.A.S.) recently insisted that there is a considerable difference between observations and perceptual images of scientists' behavior in governmental and policy-making situations when made by scientists and when they are made by persons “outside of science.†Waterman went on to say that most natural scientists would prefer to write on “science†rather than “scientists†in policy-making. Reflection on the implications of these distinctions raises several fascinating questions. In what senses may there be a political science of science? Are only natural and biological scientists equipped to investigate and interpret the behavior of scientists in non-laboratory, public policy-formulating situations? Is it necessary to have separate “natural-scientific†and “social-scientific†—to say nothing of any number of “humanistic†—views of the political role of science? What does it mean to say that the proper focus of study is the representation of science, rather than scientists in government?