IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v120y2026i2p564-581_10.html

How Partisan Are U.S. Local Elections? Evidence from 2020 Cast Vote Records

Author

Listed:
  • CONEVSKA, ALEKSANDRA
  • HIRANO, SHIGEO
  • KURIWAKI, SHIRO
  • LEWIS, JEFFREY B.
  • MUTLU, CAN
  • SNYDER, JAMES M.

Abstract

Analyzing nominally partisan contests, previous literature has argued that state and local politics have nationalized. Here we use individual ballots from the 2020 general elections covering over 50 million voters to study the relationship between individual national partisanship and voting in over 5,700 contested down-ballot contests, including nonpartisan races and ballot measures. Voting in partisan contests can be explained by voter’s national partisanship, consistent with existing literature. However, we find that voting for local nonpartisan offices and ballot measures is much less partisan. National partisanship explains more than 80% of the within-contest variation in voting for partisan state and local offices but less than 10% for local nonpartisan contests and local ballot measures. The degree of partisanship in local spending measures varies by the type of service—for example, education, roads, public safety, housing. Finally, we find evidence of structure in the pattern of votes on local spending measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Conevska, Aleksandra & Hirano, Shigeo & Kuriwaki, Shiro & Lewis, Jeffrey B. & Mutlu, Can & Snyder, James M., 2026. "How Partisan Are U.S. Local Elections? Evidence from 2020 Cast Vote Records," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 120(2), pages 564-581, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:120:y:2026:i:2:p:564-581_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055425100920/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:120:y:2026:i:2:p:564-581_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.