IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v119y2025i4p2019-2026_28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Perceptions of Minority Inclusion and Feelings of Political Efficacy: A Replication, Validation, and Extension

Author

Listed:
  • CLARK, CHRISTOPHER J.
  • ROGERS, STEVEN

Abstract

Stauffer (2021) shows that when Americans perceive their legislatures as having more gender diversity, they perceive these institutions to be more responsive. In this letter, we use an independently fielded survey to validate Stauffer’s findings and investigate whether her findings extend to race. We successfully replicate Stauffer’s analyses. We also newly demonstrate that perceptions of Black representation in legislatures are related to increased external efficacy, and perceptions of gender descriptive representation are associated with increased trust. Such findings underscore the importance of studying citizens’ perceptions of descriptive representation to understand their attitudes toward government.

Suggested Citation

  • Clark, Christopher J. & Rogers, Steven, 2025. "Public Perceptions of Minority Inclusion and Feelings of Political Efficacy: A Replication, Validation, and Extension," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 119(4), pages 2019-2026, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:4:p:2019-2026_28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055424001308/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:4:p:2019-2026_28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.