IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v119y2025i4p2002-2010_26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regularized Regression Can Reintroduce Backdoor Confounding: The Case of Mass Polarization

Author

Listed:
  • MELLON, JONATHAN
  • PROSSER, CHRISTOPHER

Abstract

Regularization can improve statistical estimates made with highly correlated data. However, any regularization procedure embeds assumptions about the data generating process that can have counterintuitive consequences when those assumptions are untenable. We show that rather than simply shrinking estimates, regularization can reopen backdoor causal paths, inflating the estimates of some effects, and in the wrong circumstances, even reversing their direction. Recently, Cavari and Freedman (2023), argued that declining cooperation rates in surveys have inflated measures of mass polarization. We show that this finding is driven by large penalty terms in their regularized regressions, which leads to the estimates being confounded with time. Alternative methods do not show a clear positive or negative effect of declining cooperation on estimated levels of mass polarization.

Suggested Citation

  • Mellon, Jonathan & Prosser, Christopher, 2025. "Regularized Regression Can Reintroduce Backdoor Confounding: The Case of Mass Polarization," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 119(4), pages 2002-2010, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:4:p:2002-2010_26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055424000935/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:4:p:2002-2010_26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.