IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v119y2025i4p1777-1791_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vox Populi: Popular Support for the Popular Initiative

Author

Listed:
  • LEEMANN, LUCAS
  • EMMENEGGER, PATRICK
  • WALTER, ANDRÉ

Abstract

Direct democratic institutions are often introduced by popular vote, but there is little research on what motivates voters to support these new instruments. Using a unique dataset on the ideological positions of voters and members of parliament, this article examines support for the introduction of the initiative right in a popular vote. We find that voters support the initiative right when they are inadequately represented in parliament. Moreover, the analysis shows that the voting behavior is consistent with voters understanding the strategic implications of adopting the popular initiative. We demonstrate that voters support its adoption if they are ideologically more proximate to the median voter than they are to the median legislator. Finally, the article shows that ideological distance matters for voters of the ruling party as well, which helps explain why a majority of voters support a political institution that limits the ruling party’s room for maneuver.

Suggested Citation

  • Leemann, Lucas & Emmenegger, Patrick & Walter, André, 2025. "Vox Populi: Popular Support for the Popular Initiative," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 119(4), pages 1777-1791, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:4:p:1777-1791_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055424001400/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:4:p:1777-1791_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.