IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v119y2025i4p1581-1598_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group Prototypicality and Boundary Definition: Comparing White and Black Perceptions of Whether Latinos Are American

Author

Listed:
  • OCAMPO-ROLAND, ANGIE N.

Abstract

Examining group boundaries is instrumental to understanding intergroup relations, particularly differences in boundary drawing between prototypical and peripheral group members. Whether identity strength and prototypicality have an interactive effect on how group members draw boundaries has been underexplored. We also know less about how different Latinos are viewed, despite the group’s vast diversity. This paper takes up these questions and compares white and Black Americans’ views of Latinos as American. Strikingly, among all respondents, U.S. born Latinos are seen as less American when their parent is undocumented. The results suggest that Black Americans are driven by economic and political concerns and perceive greater commonality with more marginalized Latinos. Whites are driven by cultural concerns and prefer those who will not challenge their prototypicality. This illustrates a divergence in how Latinos are received among each group.

Suggested Citation

  • Ocampo-Roland, Angie N., 2025. "Group Prototypicality and Boundary Definition: Comparing White and Black Perceptions of Whether Latinos Are American," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 119(4), pages 1581-1598, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:4:p:1581-1598_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000305542400131X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:4:p:1581-1598_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.