IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v119y2025i3p1530-1535_31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Gendered Impact of Corruption Revelations: Unveiling the Role of Parties and Voters in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • GUAJARDO, GUSTAVO A.
  • SCHWINDT-BAYER, LESLIE A.

Abstract

Studies have found that women’s representation is more likely to spike after corruption scandals. However, the mechanism underlying this increase remains unclear: are parties more likely to nominate women after corruption scandals, are voters more likely to support women candidates, or is it a combination of both? Using an original dataset of audit results and the gender of 47,000 candidates running in over 10,000 mayoral elections in Mexico (2000–2019), we find that voters drive the effect. While political parties are not more likely to nominate women as candidates in municipalities with recent revelations of spending irregularities, women candidates are more likely to win elections after corruption is uncovered. In contrast to previous studies, which expect strategic parties to be behind the increases in women’s representation following corruption scandals, our findings underscore that increases in women’s representation can happen despite parties and not because of parties.

Suggested Citation

  • Guajardo, Gustavo A. & Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., 2025. "The Gendered Impact of Corruption Revelations: Unveiling the Role of Parties and Voters in Mexico," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 119(3), pages 1530-1535, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:3:p:1530-1535_31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055424000881/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:3:p:1530-1535_31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.