IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v119y2025i3p1304-1321_17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politicians’ Theories of Voting Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • LUCAS, JACK
  • SHEFFER, LIOR
  • LOEWEN, PETER JOHN
  • WALGRAVE, STEFAAN
  • SOONTJENS, KAROLIN
  • AMSALEM, ERAN
  • BAILER, STEFANIE
  • BRACK, NATHALIE
  • BREUNIG, CHRISTIAN
  • BUNDI, PIRMIN
  • COUFAL, LINDA
  • DUMONT, PATRICK
  • LACHANCE, SARAH
  • PEREIRA, MIGUEL M.
  • PERSSON, MIKAEL
  • PILET, JEAN-BENOIT
  • RASMUSSEN, ANNE
  • STERBA, MAJ-BRITT
  • VARONE, FRÉDÉRIC

Abstract

While political scientists regularly engage in spirited theoretical debates about elections and voting behavior, few have noticed that elected politicians also have theories of elections and voting. Here, we investigate politicians’ positions on eight central theoretical debates in the area of elections and voting behavior and compare politicians’ theories to those held by ordinary citizens. Using data from face-to-face interviews with nearly one thousand politicians in 11 countries, together with corresponding surveys of more than twelve thousand citizens, we show that politicians overwhelmingly hold thin, minimalist, “democratic realist” theories of voting, while citizens’ theories are more optimistic and policy oriented. Politicians’ theoretical tendencies—along with their theoretical misalignment from citizens—are remarkably consistent across countries. These theories are likely to have important consequences for how politicians campaign, communicate with the public, think about public policy, and represent their constituents.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas, Jack & Sheffer, Lior & Loewen, Peter John & Walgrave, Stefaan & Soontjens, Karolin & Amsalem, Eran & Bailer, Stefanie & Brack, Nathalie & Breunig, Christian & Bundi, Pirmin & Coufal, Linda & Du, 2025. "Politicians’ Theories of Voting Behavior," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 119(3), pages 1304-1321, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:3:p:1304-1321_17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055424001060/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:119:y:2025:i:3:p:1304-1321_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.