IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v115y2021i2p522-536_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constitutional Origins and Liberal Democracy: A Global Analysis, 1900–2015

Author

Listed:
  • NEGRETTO, GABRIEL L.
  • SÁNCHEZ-TALANQUER, MARIANO

Abstract

A strong tradition in democratic theory claims that only constitutions made with direct popular involvement can establish or deepen democracy. Against this view, we argue that new constitutions are likely to enhance liberal democracy when they emerge through a plural agreement among political elites with distinct bases of social support. Power dispersion during constitution writing induces the adoption of institutions that protect opposition forces from the arbitrary use of executive power without unduly impairing majority rule. However, since incumbents may renege on the bargain, the democratizing effect of politically plural constitutional agreements is likely to be larger in the short term, when the identity of negotiating political forces and the balance of power between them tend to remain stable. We find support for these arguments using an original global dataset on the origins of constitutions between 1900 and 2015 and a difference-in-differences design.

Suggested Citation

  • Negretto, Gabriel L. & Sánchez-Talanquer, Mariano, 2021. "Constitutional Origins and Liberal Democracy: A Global Analysis, 1900–2015," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 115(2), pages 522-536, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:115:y:2021:i:2:p:522-536_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055420001069/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guillermo Larrain & Gabriel Negretto & Stefan Voigt, 2023. "How not to write a constitution: lessons from Chile," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 194(3), pages 233-247, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:115:y:2021:i:2:p:522-536_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.