IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v114y2020i4p989-1000_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Women’s Representation and the Gendered Pipeline to Power

Author

Listed:
  • THOMSEN, DANIELLE M.
  • KING, AARON S.

Abstract

The leading explanation for the underrepresentation of women in American politics is that women are less likely to run for office than men, but scholars have given less attention in recent years to the gender makeup of the pipeline to elected office. We examine the gendered pipeline to power across three potential candidate pools: lower-level officeholders, those named in newspapers as likely candidates, and lawyers who made political contributions. We find some evidence that women are less likely to seek elected office; however, the dearth of women in the pipeline plays a much greater role in the lack of women candidates. For the gender disparity in candidates to close, women have to be far more likely to run for office than men, particularly on the Republican side. Our results highlight the need to consider the gendered pipeline to power alongside rates of entry in studies of women’s underrepresentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomsen, Danielle M. & King, Aaron S., 2020. "Women’s Representation and the Gendered Pipeline to Power," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(4), pages 989-1000, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:114:y:2020:i:4:p:989-1000_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055420000404/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cynthia Richie Terrell & Courtney Lamendola & Maura Reilly, 2021. "Election Reform and Women’s Representation: Ranked Choice Voting in the U.S," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 332-343.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:114:y:2020:i:4:p:989-1000_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.