IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v112y2018i01p112-124_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Durkheim on Social Justice: The Argument from “Organic Solidarityâ€

Author

Listed:
  • HERZOG, LISA

Abstract

This article reintroduces a long-forgotten argument into the debate about social justice: Durkheim's argument from “organic solidarity,†as presented in The Division of Labor in Society. “Organic solidarity†is solidarity based on differentiation. According to Durkheim, it grows out of the division of labor, but only if the latter happens “spontaneously.†Social inequality creates obstacles to such spontaneity because it distorts prices, such that they are perceived as unjust, and it undermines equality of opportunity. Hence, Durkheim's argument connects commutative justice and distributive justice. The article argues that Durkheim's argument is plausible, interesting, and relevant for today. After presenting the argument, discussing its structure and methodology, and evaluating its plausibility by drawing on related contemporary debates, it focuses on the problem of the perception of social justice and the possibility of ideological distortions. It concludes by sketching the research program that follows from Durkheim's argument.

Suggested Citation

  • Herzog, Lisa, 2018. "Durkheim on Social Justice: The Argument from “Organic Solidarityâ€," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 112(1), pages 112-124, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:112:y:2018:i:01:p:112-124_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000305541700048X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:112:y:2018:i:01:p:112-124_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.