IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/anacsi/v9y2015i01p134-166_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of the Pension Protection Fund in financial risk management of UK defined benefit pension sector: a multi-period economic capital study

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Wei
  • Tapadar, Pradip

Abstract

With the advent of formal regulatory requirements for rigorous risk-based, or economic, capital quantification for the financial risk management of banking and insurance sectors, regulators and policy-makers are turning their attention to the pension sector, the other integral player in the financial markets. In this paper, we analyse the impact of applying economic capital techniques to defined benefit pension schemes in the United Kingdom. We propose two alternative economic capital quantification approaches, first, for individual defined benefit pension schemes on a stand-alone basis and then for the pension sector as a whole by quantifying economic capital of the UK’s Pension Protection Fund, which takes over eligible schemes with deficit, in the event of sponsor insolvency. We find that economic capital requirements for individual schemes are significantly high. However, we show that sharing risks through the Pension Protection Fund reduces the aggregate economic capital requirement of the entire sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Wei & Tapadar, Pradip, 2015. "Role of the Pension Protection Fund in financial risk management of UK defined benefit pension sector: a multi-period economic capital study," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 134-166, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:9:y:2015:i:01:p:134-166_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1748499514000256/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:9:y:2015:i:01:p:134-166_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.