IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/anacsi/v2y2007i02p233-270_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The United Kingdom State Pension System: Analysis of Proposed Reforms and the Viability of Immigration-Based Policies in Response to Demographic Ageing

Author

Listed:
  • Kotecha, K. N.

Abstract

This paper briefly examines the options for reform proposed by the Pensions Commission in 2004 to sustain the United Kingdom state pension system in response to an ageing population. It further explores, under various scenarios, the long-term viability of immigration as an alternative policy response, by developing a population projection model to determine the replacement migration levels which would be required to maintain contributions (taxes) at current levels, using population data and assumptions in the public domain. The economic and social implications of immigration-based policies are also considered. This paper does not consider the specific policy recommendations in the Commission's Second Report published in autumn 2005, which at the time of writing was undergoing an internal consultation process. The results indicate that not only does each policy option proposed by the Pensions Commission require changes which are too large for the policy to be implemented on its own, but that a combination of options is likely to require discomforting changes at the individual level when considered under plausible scenarios. Economic and social implications aside, the results also indicate that immigration is an inefficient and ineffective way of mitigating demographic ageing. The required replacement migration levels are abnormally high and too volatile for it to be considered as a viable policy alternative.

Suggested Citation

  • Kotecha, K. N., 2007. "The United Kingdom State Pension System: Analysis of Proposed Reforms and the Viability of Immigration-Based Policies in Response to Demographic Ageing," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 233-270, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:2:y:2007:i:02:p:233-270_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S174849950000035X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:2:y:2007:i:02:p:233-270_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.