IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/anacsi/v20y2026i1p74-95_5.html

Utilizing large language models (LLMs) for quantitative reasoning-intensive tasks within the (re)insurance sector

Author

Listed:
  • Hao, Yilin
  • Tian, Xiaojuan
  • Zhao, Haoran
  • Baldassarre, Luca

Abstract

The rise of large language models (LLMs) has marked a substantial leap toward artificial general intelligence. However, the utilization of LLMs in (re)insurance sector remains a challenging problem because of the gap between general capabilities and domain-specific requirements. Two prevalent methods for domain specialization of LLMs involve prompt engineering and fine-tuning. In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of LLMs, enhanced with prompt engineering and fine-tuning techniques, on quantitative reasoning tasks within the (re)insurance domain. It is found that (1) compared to prompt engineering, fine-tuning with task-specific calculation dataset provides a remarkable leap in performance, even exceeding the performance of larger pre-trained LLMs; (2) when acquired task-specific calculation data are limited, supplementing LLMs with domain-specific knowledge dataset is an effective alternative; and (3) enhanced reasoning capabilities should be the primary focus for LLMs when tackling quantitative tasks, surpassing mere computational skills. Moreover, the fine-tuned models demonstrate a consistent aptitude for common-sense reasoning and factual knowledge, as evidenced by their performance on public benchmarks. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of LLMs to be utilized as powerful tools to serve as AI assistants and solve quantitative reasoning tasks in (re)insurance sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao, Yilin & Tian, Xiaojuan & Zhao, Haoran & Baldassarre, Luca, 2026. "Utilizing large language models (LLMs) for quantitative reasoning-intensive tasks within the (re)insurance sector," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 74-95, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:20:y:2026:i:1:p:74-95_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1748499525100079/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:20:y:2026:i:1:p:74-95_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.