IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/anacsi/v17y2023i1p118-144_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unbiased estimator for the ultimate claim prediction error in the chain-ladder model of Mack

Author

Listed:
  • Siegenthaler, Filippo

Abstract

We propose a new estimator for the ultimate prediction uncertainty within the famous Mack’s distribution-free chain-ladder model, which can be proved to be unbiased (conditionally given the first triangle column) under some additional technical assumptions. A peculiar behaviour of the unbiased estimator is given by its possible negativity. This is a drawback which might be worth trading off for the unbiasedness property, since there is empirical evidence that the likelihood of a negative realisation is extremely low. This offers an alternative to the well-known Mack and BBMW formulas since the latters can be proved to be biased. However, we also show that this novel estimator, as well as the Mack and BBMW formulas, can (with non-negligible probability) materially fail to estimate the true uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Siegenthaler, Filippo, 2023. "Unbiased estimator for the ultimate claim prediction error in the chain-ladder model of Mack," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 118-144, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:118-144_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1748499522000082/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:118-144_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.