IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/anacsi/v13y2019i01p80-91_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis of power law distributions and tipping points during the global financial crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yifei
  • Shi, Lei
  • Allan, Neil
  • Evans, John

Abstract

Heavy-tailed distributions have been observed for various financial risks and papers have observed that these heavy-tailed distributions are power law distributions. The breakdown of a power law distribution is also seen as an indicator of a tipping point being reached and a system then moves from stability through instability to a new equilibrium. In this paper, we analyse the distribution of operational risk losses in US banks, credit defaults in US corporates and market risk events in the US during the global financial crisis (GFC). We conclude that market risk and credit risk do not follow a power law distribution, and even though operational risk follows a power law distribution, there is a better distribution fit for operational risk. We also conclude that whilst there is evidence that credit defaults and market risks did reach a tipping point, operational risk losses did not. We conclude that the government intervention in the banking system during the GFC was a possible cause of banks avoiding a tipping point.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yifei & Shi, Lei & Allan, Neil & Evans, John, 2019. "An analysis of power law distributions and tipping points during the global financial crisis," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 80-91, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:13:y:2019:i:01:p:80-91_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1748499518000088/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:anacsi:v:13:y:2019:i:01:p:80-91_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.