Author
Listed:
- Rusvi A. Gandhi
- Umesh P. Tarpada
- Vivek N. Dave
- Kaushik N. Kundaliya
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the in vitro activity the antifungal activity of chalcone-coumarin-based heterocyclic polymers (8a–8e) against four clinically relevant fungal strains: Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Fusarium solani. Using MIC₅₀ values with fluconazole as the reference drug, the study highlighted the superior antifungal potential of these polymers, particularly 8c, which demonstrated significantly lower MIC₅₀ values compared to fluconazole against C. albicans (12.31 ± 0.85 µg/mL vs. 28.51 ± 1.98 µg/mL) and F. solani (13.57 ± 0.79 µg/mL vs. 30.92 ± 2.12 µg/mL). The enhanced efficacy of compound 8c is attributed to the synergistic effects of chalcone and coumarin moieties, which improve membrane disruption, ergosterol biosynthesis inhibition, and enzymatic interference. Polymer 8e also showed potent activity, particularly against C. albicans (14.72 ± 0.96 µg/mL) and F. solani (16.89 ± 0.87 µg/mL), then the fluconazole. While 8a and 8b exhibited moderate activity, 8b showed comparable activity to fluconazole against A. niger (50.39 ± 3.12 µg/mL vs. 35.88 ± 2.04 µg/mL). Polymer 8d showed intermediate efficacy, especially against C. albicans (19.84 ± 1.23 µg/mL) and F. solani (16.34 ± 1.09 µg/mL). Polymer 8a shows a significantly higher binding affinity (–8.92 kcal/mol) toward fungal Nmt protein compared to fluconazole (–5.44 kcal/mol), suggesting stronger and more stable interactions. These findings underscore the potential of chalcone-coumarin heterocyclic polymers as promising antifungal agents, with 8c and 8e being particularly effective against resistant strains.
Suggested Citation
Rusvi A. Gandhi & Umesh P. Tarpada & Vivek N. Dave & Kaushik N. Kundaliya, 2026.
"Chalcone–Coumarin Polymers: Synthesis and Antifungal Evaluation with Docking Studies,"
International Journal of Scientific Research in Chemistry, International Journal of Scientific Research in Chemistry, vol. 11(2), pages 29-40, March.
Handle:
RePEc:cuo:ijsrch:v11:y2026:i2:id:82
DOI: 10.32628/IJSRCH261125
Note: Article URL: https://ijsrch.com/home/article/view/IJSRCH261125
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuo:ijsrch:v11:y2026:i2:id:82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pankaj Sharma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijsrch.com/home .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.