IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Consistent Speciffcation Tests for Regression Models

Listed author(s):
  • Chunrong Ai

    (Department of Economics, University of Florida)

Registered author(s):

    This paper presents three procedures for testing specifications of regression models. The first procedure is parametric and it tests the specification of an unconditional moment restriction model against a nonnested unconditional moment restriction model. The second procedure is nonparametric and it tests the specification of a conditional moment restriction model against a nonnested conditional moment restriction model. The third procedure also is nonparametric but it tests the specification of a conditional moment restriction model against all alternative specifications. All procedures permit heteroskedasticity of unknown form and are shown to be consistent. The test statistics of the first two procedures are simply the t-ratios of a 2SLS estimator while that of the third procedure is computable from LS output via auxiliary LS regressions.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Society for AEF in its journal Annals of Economics and Finance.

    Volume (Year): 2 (2001)
    Issue (Month): 1 (May)
    Pages: 31-58

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cuf:journl:y:2001:v:2:i:1:p:31-58
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuf:journl:y:2001:v:2:i:1:p:31-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Qiang Gao)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.