IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of Transitory Volatility over the Week


  • Charles Cao

    () (Department of Finance, Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University)

  • Hyuk Choe

    () (College of Business Administration, Seoul National University)


This study examines the evolution of transitory volatility over the week for NYSE/AMEX stocks. We treat the block of five trading days during a week as a single trading session and control for disproportionate rates of information arrival over the week by comparing variances of weekly returns measured on different days of the week. Our evidence, from both portfolios and individual stocks, is largely consistent with the implications of price formation models. We find that prices on Mondays contain significantly greater transitory volatility than prices on the other days of the week. Transitory volatility declines steadily over the week. Cross-sectionally, the speed and magnitude of dissipation of transitory volatility are greater for larger firms. Portfolio returns exhibit a much stronger pattern, suggesting that much of transitory volatility varying in the process of price formation is not diversifiable. Similar evidence is obtained from our analyses of the Dow Jones Index, the S\&P 500 index futures and the Japanese Nikkei 225 Index.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Cao & Hyuk Choe, 2000. "Evolution of Transitory Volatility over the Week," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 1(1), pages 49-77, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cuf:journl:y:2000:v:1:i:1:p:49-77

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Transitory volatility; Price formation; Exogenous liquidity demand;

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuf:journl:y:2000:v:1:i:1:p:49-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Qiang Gao). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.