IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Evolution of Transitory Volatility over the Week

Listed author(s):
  • Charles Cao


    (Department of Finance, Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University)

  • Hyuk Choe


    (College of Business Administration, Seoul National University)

This study examines the evolution of transitory volatility over the week for NYSE/AMEX stocks. We treat the block of five trading days during a week as a single trading session and control for disproportionate rates of information arrival over the week by comparing variances of weekly returns measured on different days of the week. Our evidence, from both portfolios and individual stocks, is largely consistent with the implications of price formation models. We find that prices on Mondays contain significantly greater transitory volatility than prices on the other days of the week. Transitory volatility declines steadily over the week. Cross-sectionally, the speed and magnitude of dissipation of transitory volatility are greater for larger firms. Portfolio returns exhibit a much stronger pattern, suggesting that much of transitory volatility varying in the process of price formation is not diversifiable. Similar evidence is obtained from our analyses of the Dow Jones Index, the S\&P 500 index futures and the Japanese Nikkei 225 Index.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Society for AEF in its journal Annals of Economics and Finance.

Volume (Year): 1 (2000)
Issue (Month): 1 (May)
Pages: 49-77

in new window

Handle: RePEc:cuf:journl:y:2000:v:1:i:1:p:49-77
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuf:journl:y:2000:v:1:i:1:p:49-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Qiang Gao)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.