IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cuc/eforum/v15y2025i3p112-122.html

Social capital in the digital economy: Transforming hromada project financing models using RWA tokenisation

Author

Listed:
  • Maryna Riabokin
  • Yevgen Kotukh

Abstract

The relevance of this study lied in the implementation of innovative financing mechanisms for Ukraine’s territorial hromadas in the context of post-war recovery, focusing on the significant untapped potential of household savings. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of using Real World Asset tokenisation as a tool to mobilise internal financial resources by activating social capital. According to expert estimates, Ukrainian household savings held outside the formal banking system were estimated at between 70 billion USD and 120 billion USD. Scenario modelling showed that even a conservative mobilisation of 1% of these funds (1.2 billion USD) would enable the implementation of over 2,000 infrastructure projects. Under a realistic scenario (2.5% or 3 billion USD), hromadas could carry out up to 6,000 large or 20,000 smaller initiatives, including school renovations, water supply upgrades, and solar power plants. The study proposed a conceptual framework that integrated social capital (trust, networks, and shared values), blockchain tools (tokens and smart contracts), and economic incentives (dividends, savings, governance rights). A typology of projects eligible for tokenisation was presented, along with an investment distribution structure and expected financial and social outcomes. The research also outlined a multi-level benefits system for household investors – ranging from dividends to participation in decision making through Data Access Object platforms. It emphasised the reciprocal relationship between social capital and Real World Asset tokenisation: trust and local networks enabled investment, while successful implementation reinforced civic engagement and community cohesion. The practical value of this study is that it offers territorial hromadas a replicable model for converting passive savings into active capital for sustainable development through digital infrastructure

Suggested Citation

  • Maryna Riabokin & Yevgen Kotukh, 2025. "Social capital in the digital economy: Transforming hromada project financing models using RWA tokenisation," E-Forum Working Papers, Economic Forum, vol. 15(3), pages 112-122, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:112-122
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62763/ef/3.2025.112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-forum.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/EF_15_3_2025_112-122.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.62763/ef/3.2025.112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Fernandez-Vazquez & Rafael Rosillo & David De La Fuente & Paolo Priore, 2019. "Blockchain in FinTech: A Mapping Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Chen, Yan & Bellavitis, Cristiano, 2020. "Blockchain disruption and decentralized finance: The rise of decentralized business models," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 13(C).
    3. Aldo Barba & Massimo Pivetti, 2009. "Rising household debt: Its causes and macroeconomic implications--a long-period analysis," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 33(1), pages 113-137, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wolfgang Drobetz & Lars Hornuf & Paul P. Momtaz & Niclas Schermann, 2025. "Token-Based Crowdfunding: Investor Choice and the Optimal Timing of Initial Coin Offerings," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 49(1), pages 232-282, January.
    2. Till Treeck, 2014. "Did Inequality Cause The U.S. Financial Crisis?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 421-448, July.
    3. Mark Setterfield, 2024. "Managing the Discontent of the Losers Redux: A Future of Authoritarian Neoliberalism or Social Capitalism?," FMM Working Paper 98-2024, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    4. Sujeeth Ungratwar & Dipasha Sharma & Satish Kumar, 2025. "Mapping the digital banking landscape: a multi-dimensional exploration of fintech, digital payments, and e-wallets, with insights into current scenarios and future research," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Stefano Di Bucchianico, 2020. "A note on financialization from a Classical-Keynesian standpoint," Department of Economics University of Siena 824, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    6. Mansoureh Beheshti Nejad & Seyed Mahmoud Zanjirchi & Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini Bamakan & Negar Jalilian, 2024. "Blockchain Adoption in Operations Management: A Systematic Literature Review of 14 Years of Research," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 1361-1389, August.
    7. Daniel Detzer & Eckhard Hein, 2014. "Finance-dominated capitalism in Germany – deep recession and quick recovery," Working papers wpaper54, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    8. Li, Sen & Chen, Yan, 2024. "Governing decentralized autonomous organizations as digital commons," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    9. Dehghani, Milad & William Kennedy, Ryan & Mashatan, Atefeh & Rese, Alexandra & Karavidas, Dionysios, 2022. "High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organisational adoption of blockchain technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 393-411.
    10. González, Felipe, 2017. "Privatized Keynesianism or conspicuous consumption? Status anxiety and the financialization of consumption in Chile," MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    11. Ahmet Faruk Aysan & Nawaz Farrukh, 2021. "China's Transition to a Digital Currency: Does It Threaten Dollarization?," Working Papers hal-03364939, HAL.
    12. Mark Setterfield, 2025. "The COVID pandemic and its aftermath: missed opportunities for avoiding a future of Authoritarian Neoliberalism," Working Papers 2510, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics, revised Jun 2026.
    13. Walter Paternesi Meloni, 2017. "Austerity & Competitiveness in the Eurozone: a misleading linkage," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0223, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    14. Piotr Bialowolski & Dorota Weziak‐Bialowolska, 2021. "Good credit, bad credit: The differential role of the sources of debt in life satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 967-994, September.
    15. Hein, Eckhard, 2011. "Distribution, ‘Financialisation’ and the Financial and Economic Crisis – Implications for Post-crisis Economic Policies," MPRA Paper 31180, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Kamer-Ainur Aivaz & Ionela Florea Munteanu & Flavius Valentin Jakubowicz, 2023. "Bitcoin in Conventional Markets: A Study on Blockchain-Induced Reliability, Investment Slopes, Financial and Accounting Aspects," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Riccardo Zolea, 2024. "An introduction to the distributional role of bank credit to workers in a surplus approach framework," Working Papers PKWP2403, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    18. Christian A. Belabed, 2016. "Inequality and the New Deal," IMK Working Paper 166-2016, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    19. Sergio Cesaratto, 2017. "Beyond the traditional monetary circuit: endogenous money, finance and the theory of long-period effective demand," Department of Economics University of Siena 757, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    20. İbrahim Özmen, 2025. "Which debt belongs to the state and which debt belongs to the market? Comparative new evidence several capitalist regimes," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 72(2), pages 1-34, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:112-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Economic Forum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://e-forum.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.