Author
Listed:
- Оksana Nuzhna
- Natalia Tluchkevych
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of resource efficiency at the meso level using the production function. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficiency of labor and capital costs for agricultural, forestry and fisheries enterprises on the basis of the built model of the Cobb-Douglas production function. The parameters and the model of Cobb-Douglas production functions for agricultural, forestry and fisheries enterprises are calculated according to the statistical data for the period 2012-2020 and the main characteristics of the production function are calculated. It is determined how many manufactured products (goods, services) account for an average of UAH 1 per research period. labor costs (UAH 13.78) and UAH 1. capital costs (UAH 2.65), ie 5.2 times less. It is established how many additional hryvnias of manufactured products (goods, services) each additional hryvnia brings labor costs (UAH 12.22) and each additional hryvnia costs for fixed assets (UAH 0.13), ie 94.0 times less. It is calculated by what percentage increases the volume of output (goods, services) with an increase in labor costs by 1% (0.89%) and with an increase in fixed costs by 1% (0.05%), ie in 17.8 times less. It was found that for enterprises in agriculture, forestry and fisheries of Ukraine, the built production function has a declining return on scale and economic growth is not observed. Compared with the classical model of the Cobb-Douglas production function for the US economy for 1899-1922, for the model of the production function constructed by us, the ratio of parameters a1: a2 is not 3: 1, but 18: 1, but the condition a1> a2 is preserved. in human capital has a greater effect on the growth of production compared to investment in capital in 18 times
Suggested Citation
Оksana Nuzhna & Natalia Tluchkevych, 2022.
"Study of efficiency of labor and capital costs in agricultural, forestly and fishery of Ukraine using the production function,"
E-Forum Working Papers, Economic Forum, vol. 12(1), pages 109-114, May.
Handle:
RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:109-114
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2308-8559-2022-1-13
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:109-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Economic Forum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://e-forum.com.ua/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.