IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cuc/eforum/v11y2021i2p135-141.html

Foreign experience of formation of budget potential of local finances in the conditions of decentralization

Author

Listed:
  • Oleg Kuzmak

Abstract

The article highlights that in accordance with the decentralization reform, the relevant aspect today is the study of world experience in the formation and spending of local budgets. The budget system of European countries is studied. Economic and financial decentralization has led to the formation of intergovernmental financial relations that combine the principles of both budgetary unitarism and fiscal federalism. The interpretation of the concept of budget unitarism and federalism is studied. The shares of local budget revenues in GDP in European countries are analyzed. It has been studied that in the EU, nine countries use only one level of sub government (self-government); the other twelve countries have two regional levels (municipalities and regions); while the remaining seven are three levels below the national level (municipalities, regions and intermediaries). It is determined that the constitutions of some countries sometimes do not regulate the organization of local self government at all (for example, in the USA). An assessment of the experience of European countries in terms of budget revenues from local taxes. The analysis of dynamics of budgetary potential of local finances of the Rivne region is made. It is determined that the most important economic instrument is the budget, while the management of local governments in accordance with the established budget is mandatory by law in each country. Ways to increase the tax component of the budget potential of local finances are proposed. The ways of finding alternative sources of filling local budgets through the introduction of non-tax fees are outlined

Suggested Citation

  • Oleg Kuzmak, 2021. "Foreign experience of formation of budget potential of local finances in the conditions of decentralization," E-Forum Working Papers, Economic Forum, vol. 11(2), pages 135-141, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:135-141
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2308-8559-2021-2-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-forum.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/Economic_Forum_Vol_11_No_2-135-141.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2308-8559-2021-2-17?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Fandel & Eleonora Marišová & Tomáš Malatinec & Ivana Lichnerová, 2019. "Decentralization Policies in Public Administration in Slovakia and the Czech Republic, and Their Impact on Building Offices’ Scale Efficiency," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paweł Dziekański & Piotr Prus & Mansoor Maitah & Magdalena Wrońska, 2021. "Assessment of Spatial Diversity of the Potential of the Natural Environment in the Context of Sustainable Development of Poviats in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    2. Marta Dmytryshyn & Roman Dmytryshyn & Valentyna Yakubiv & Andriy Zagorodnyuk, 2021. "Peculiarities of Ukrainians’ Approval of Decentralization Reform," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-33, September.
    3. Viera Papcunová & Jarmila Hudáková & Michaela Štubňová & Marta Urbaníková, 2020. "Revenues of Municipalities as a Tool of Local Self-Government Development (Comparative Study)," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Eleonora MARIŠOVÁ & Ivana LICHNEROVÁ & Ján MACHYNIAK, 2021. "Efficiency Of The Functioning Of Public Administration: Regional Empirical Study," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2021(36), pages 165-180, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:135-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Economic Forum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://e-forum.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.