IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctz/legper/v1y2025i2p1-6.html

程序正義的言說:東京審判韋伯庭長庭審話語中立性分析

Author

Listed:
  • 高瑩

    (浙江越秀外國語學院,浙江 紹興,312000)

Abstract

東京審判的合法性始終面臨“勝利者正義”的質疑,其程序公信力的建構因而成為關鍵。庭長韋伯爵士的庭審話語實踐是維繫審判中立性的核心。本研究將批判性話語分析與系統功能語言學作為理論框架,提出“程序性平衡”作為分析法官中立性的核心維度,並據此對韋伯在1946年12月下旬關鍵庭審中的話語進行微觀分析。研究發現,韋伯通過程序控制、證據審查與權利平衡三大策略,積極而審慎地塑造了程序公正。其高度機構化與去情感化的語言風格,進一步將審判穩固於理性軌道。文章進一步指出,“程序性平衡”並非靜態理想,而是一種在特定制度語境下的動態實踐模式,它反映了法官在複雜國際政治與法律結構中的話語調適智慧。本研究結論認為,韋伯的中立性體現為一種“積極的程序中心主義”實踐智慧,證明瞭在複雜的審判中,程序正義是實體正義與司法合法性的基石。

Suggested Citation

  • 高瑩, 2025. "程序正義的言說:東京審判韋伯庭長庭審話語中立性分析," Legal Perspectives, Brilliance Publishing Ltd., vol. 1(2), pages 1-6, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctz:legper:v:1:y:2025:i:2:p:1-6
    DOI: 10.53104/fxsy.2025.01.02.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.brilliance-pub.com/fxsy/article/view/271/122
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.53104/fxsy.2025.01.02.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctz:legper:v:1:y:2025:i:2:p:1-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.brilliance-pub.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.