IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctz/insosc/v4y2026i1p78-84.html

Hegel, Habermas, and the Discourse of Modernity

Author

Listed:
  • Fu Yi

    (School of Philosophy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China)

Abstract

This paper examines the central place of G.W.F. Hegel in Jürgen Habermas’s The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, a work that has had a lasting impact on debates concerning the fate of the modern project. Against the backdrop of disputes surrounding modernity and its critics, Habermas presents Hegel as the first philosopher to grasp modernity as a distinct philosophical problem, while also treating his system as an unsuccessful attempt to overcome the contradictions of subject-centered reason. This paper reconstructs Habermas’s interpretation of Hegel’s account of modernity, analyzes the two main lines of his critique, and then offers a critical response. It argues that Habermas’s reading does not fully capture several central features of Hegel’s philosophy, especially the concept of Geist, and that the model of communicative rationality, while intended as an alternative to subject-centered reason, does not entirely avoid the difficulties it is meant to address.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu Yi, 2026. "Hegel, Habermas, and the Discourse of Modernity," Insights in Social Science, Brilliance Publishing Ltd., vol. 4(1), pages 78-84, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctz:insosc:v:4:y:2026:i:1:p:78-84
    DOI: 10.53104/insights.soc.sci.2026.03009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.brilliance-pub.com/ISS/article/view/312/145
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.53104/insights.soc.sci.2026.03009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctz:insosc:v:4:y:2026:i:1:p:78-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.brilliance-pub.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.