IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctz/curilp/v3y2025i1p15-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal Foundations and Property Rights in China’s Carbon Emissions Trading System

Author

Listed:
  • Ruiqi Zhang

    (Yunnan Normal University)

Abstract

China’s Carbon Emissions Trading System (ETS) represents a significant step in integrating market-based mechanisms into the country’s climate governance framework. Launched nationally in 2021 after a decade of regional experimentation, the ETS is designed to help achieve China’s dual carbon goals—peaking emissions before 2030 and reaching carbon neutrality by 2060. However, the system’s long-term effectiveness is heavily contingent upon the clarity and maturity of its legal foundations, particularly the definition and protection of property rights related to carbon allowances. This paper explores the legal evolution of China’s ETS, focusing on how administrative measures, environmental laws, and regulatory oversight collectively form its current operational base. It critically examines the legal status of emission allowances, the limits of administrative enforcement, and the implications for market liquidity, financial integration, and investor confidence. Ongoing challenges—such as the lack of a unified carbon trading law, underdeveloped dispute resolution mechanisms, and the ambiguous classification of allowances—are analyzed as part of a dynamic and transitional legal ecosystem. Drawing from both domestic policy discourse and international legal models, the paper offers targeted recommendations for future legal reform aimed at enhancing transparency, legal certainty, and systemic resilience. It concludes that while China’s ETS is still in its formative stage, it is on a positive legal trajectory that could shape the development of carbon markets in other emerging economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruiqi Zhang, 2025. "Legal Foundations and Property Rights in China’s Carbon Emissions Trading System," Current Research in Law & Practice, Brilliance Publishing Ltd., vol. 3(1), pages 15-31, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctz:curilp:v:3:y:2025:i:1:p:15-31
    DOI: 10.53104/curr.res.law.pract.2025.07002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.brilliance-pub.com/CRLP/article/view/178/75
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.53104/curr.res.law.pract.2025.07002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctz:curilp:v:3:y:2025:i:1:p:15-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.brilliance-pub.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.