IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctl/louvde/v91y2025i3p487-507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who is the “boss” in planning to have a baby? Fertility and household bargaining in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jie MA

    (Jinhe Center for Economic Research, Xi'an Jiaotong University)

  • Xiaojun YANG

    (School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University)

  • Yxuan FEI

    (School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University)

Abstract

Although fertility is typically regarded as a unitary family decision, a meaningful degree of disagreement in fertility willingness exists within households, especially for having two or more children. As China transitioned from a one-child to multiple-child policy, understanding how such disagreement affects fertility decisions is crucial. Using household data from the 2016 China Labor-force Dynamic Survey, we analyze fertility willingness in married couples. We find that over 10% of families disagree on having two or more children. Disagreement negatively impacts plans to have more children: only the husband wanting two children significantly reduces fertility plans compared to mutual agreement, while only the wife wanting two children does not suppress the plan. This is consistent with the wife's veto power in fertility decisions. Heterogeneity analyses reveal that more equal gender role and higher bargaining power contribute to the wife's veto power, offering insights into the mechanism of intra-household fertility decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie MA & Xiaojun YANG & Yxuan FEI, 2025. "Who is the “boss” in planning to have a baby? Fertility and household bargaining in China," JODE - Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 91(3), pages 487-507, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctl:louvde:v:91:y:2025:i:3:p:487-507
    DOI: 10.1017/dem.2025.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2025.2
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1017/dem.2025.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D10 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - General
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctl:louvde:v:91:y:2025:i:3:p:487-507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sebastien SCHILLINGS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iruclbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.