IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v73y2025i1p77-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Forum: Comparing Canadian Output-Based Pricing Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Cui

    (Peter A. Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia)

Abstract

The Canadian public widely anticipates the demise of the federal fuel charge in 2025, and politicians and journalists now frequently refer to "industrial carbon pricing" as the main line of defence still held in Canada's greenhouse gas emission reduction plan. This commentary examines the most important component of this line of defence--namely, federal and provincial output-based pricing systems (OBPS). It assembles hitherto obscure information with respect to three OBPS design features: eligibility, stringency of emission reduction requirements, and total cost to emitters. The study finds that OBPS implementation is off to a weak start. Many sectors that do not genuinely compete with foreign firms are eligible to participate. Provinces encourage facilities to opt into OBPS--meaning, out of full carbon pricing--with little selection. Most provinces only require facilities to slowly reduce emissions relative to their past performance, instead of catching up to low-emission peers. And low-emission facilities face weak incentives to further reduce emissions due to weak or non-existent price signals on emissions-trading markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Cui, 2025. "Policy Forum: Comparing Canadian Output-Based Pricing Systems," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 73(1), pages 77-93.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:73:y:2025:i:1:p:77-93
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2025.73.1.pf.cui.obps
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2025CTJ1.aspx
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2025.73.1.pf.cui.obps?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:73:y:2025:i:1:p:77-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.