IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v72y2024i2p359-374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Forum: The Registered Charity Appeals Process—More Reasons (and a Few Proposals) for Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Kathryn Chan

    (Faculty of Law, University of Victoria)

Abstract

The current process of challenging decisions of the Canada Revenue Agency's Charities Directorate has significant shortcomings, which are well known within the field. A series of committees and scholars have urged Parliament to increase the transparency of the directorate's decision-making processes and create a more accessible appeal process for registered charities. In this article, the author discusses two developments that have made the case for reforming the charity appeals process even more compelling than before. The first is the Supreme Court of Canada's overhaul of the judicial review framework in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov (2019 SCC 65); the second is the trend toward public-law challenges to the registered charity regime in the superior courts. The author also outlines possible options for reform of the current Canadian model. Among other things, she considers whether elements of the English charity-law reference procedure could be accommodated within the existing registered charity regime in Canada's Income Tax Act.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathryn Chan, 2024. "Policy Forum: The Registered Charity Appeals Process—More Reasons (and a Few Proposals) for Reform," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 72(2), pages 359-374.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:72:y:2024:i:2:p:359-374
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2024.72.2.pf.chan
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2024CTJ2.aspx
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2024.72.2.pf.chan?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:72:y:2024:i:2:p:359-374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.