IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v70y2022isuppp209-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

All in the Family: Assessing Need in the Fiscal Unit

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Milligan

    (University of British Columbia)

Abstract

This paper contrasts the measurement of family neediness based on economic units used for economic analysis and fiscal units used for tax purposes. The paper makes three contributions to the literature. First, the author identifies ways in which the economic unit and the fiscal unit are in discord and argues why this matters. Second, he presents evidence of the prevalence of discord between measures of neediness based on economic and fiscal units; he finds that about 28 percent of Canadians live in economic units that differ from their fiscal units. Third, the author demonstrates the quantitative relevance of this discord using two case studies. In a case study of the measurement of poverty, he finds that about half of the people living in fiscal units that appear needy when only the fiscal unit's income is considered are not below the official poverty line when the economic unit's income is used. In the other case study, the author finds that a proposed basic income scheme spends almost two-thirds of its budget on people who are not in poverty and 40 percent on children age 18 and over living with their parents.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Milligan, 2022. "All in the Family: Assessing Need in the Fiscal Unit," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 70(Supplemen), pages 209-229.
    • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:70:y:2022:i:supp:p:209-229
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2022.70.supp.milligan
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2022CTJSP.aspx
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2022.70.supp.milligan?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:70:y:2022:i:supp:p:209-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.